Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah — I think a “you sell it, you scrap it” law would de-externalize a lot of really harmful end-user sales: not just for source manufacturers, but every middle-man in between.


Not sure if that is enough given that most product returns are destroyed - from iPads to brand new clothes. So than that rule is already out I think? Though an extension that that is forbidden in some sense should be fair. Or a rule that forbids the relative amount of trash produced by a company?


Here in Norway we have a law to handle recycling and waste handling of electrical equipment[1].

It requires importers and producers of electrical and electronic equipment to be a member of a return company like Norsirk or RENAS[2], directly funding the collection, recycling and waste handling.

Something similar could be introduced for other product groups as well like clothes.

[1]: https://norsirk.no/produsentansvar/lover-og-regler/om-avfall...

[2]: https://renas.no/


The customer ends up holding the negative exernality with little ability to affect the upstream pipeline. By sending the waste "back up the pipe" it becomes each middle-company's problem. The point being that each company now has to consider how to get rid of their own generated waste. It de-externalizes the waste problem.

If they choose to put the waste in to a landfill, then so be it: they have to pay to do that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: