> There is no class of people whose existence and rights you should be debating, period,
I think this is a strawman. On the right, generally speaking, the existence and rights of sexual minorities are generally recognized. The big thing these days is whether or not young children should be taught about the existence, activities, or their possible membership in those minorities.
Yes, people being dicks online exist, but everyone should remember that the internet is a dramatization of real (or fictional) events, not a true and accurate representation of even a plurality of people.
A great example is the recent bill in Florida that we all know about. The left got upset because of how the loud voices mischaracterized it. The right got upset because parents' worst nightmares started condemning the bill.
I think this is a strawman. On the right, generally speaking, the existence and rights of sexual minorities are generally recognized. The big thing these days is whether or not young children should be taught about the existence, activities, or their possible membership in those minorities.
Yes, people being dicks online exist, but everyone should remember that the internet is a dramatization of real (or fictional) events, not a true and accurate representation of even a plurality of people.
A great example is the recent bill in Florida that we all know about. The left got upset because of how the loud voices mischaracterized it. The right got upset because parents' worst nightmares started condemning the bill.
In real life, it's not that massive of a change.