Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think managers are usually in it just for the money. Like most other people. It might be not fruitful to read much into it.

Many teams find it easier to work sitting close to each other. Is this superior? Is WFH superior? Is hybrid superior? I don’t think there’s a fixed answer because such things work both individually and collectively.

WFH can be better for you but not for 2 of your coworkers. Now who’s supposed to adapt to what?

For example: for me meetings and discussions are too many times better in person.

And hybrid is worse imho. You are stuck to living close to office so you can’t live wherever you wish. And then you’re working from office but also working from home so for many teams and folks that expectation of some sort of “always availability” (work/life blurred line) will continue.



WFH is better in the long run for the environment and thus for everyone. Also, with fewer people commuting to large cities, smaller towns will grow. And wealth will redistribute to local neighbourhoods. Bedroom communities will have patrons with money (for a change) able to sustain businesses that were infeasible when everyone spent their entire day in the city. Youth might be less inclined to brain drain to the big city, and then support interesting local restaurants and bars. Parents will support local children's activities. Grand parents will live near their children. Bike paths, public transit, public parks will all have reasons to exist! Man, it sounds amazing all listed out here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: