Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The idea is that the strontium-90, carbon-14, etc can be filtered out, leaving just the tritiated water to be discharged.


According to the article I cited:

> Greenpeace said it had confirmed with Tepco that the system was not designed to remove carbon-14

Maybe there are updates on this matter but I couldn't find anything online.


Sounds like you're right about the carbon-14:

"C-14 also cannot be removed by ALPS, but its concentration is far lower than its regulatory standard for discharge."

Source: https://www.meti.go.jp/english/earthquake/nuclear/decommissi...


Is the carbon-14 an actual health concern, or just a PITA for future archeologists?


Nitpicking: The archeologist already have tables to fix variations of the C_14 vs C_12 in the past https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_calibration


Except if you consider the "entropy" of doing that, you have an enormous amount of energy inputs required.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: