Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Does that mean I don't deserve to have the bargaining power for the best deal for myself?

No, I do not believe you are entitled to a wealth transfer from people who are better at your job than you are. (Or, to put it another way, you're certainly free to do a little collective bargaining if you'd like, but the World's Greatest Widget Engineer has no reason to join your union.)



> better at your job than you are

What you mean is «better at negotiating than you are».

Work skill an negotiation skills don’t always coincide (in my experience they almost never do).


I think a lot of devs are led to believe they're the World's Greatest Widget Engineer but what they've really fallen for is the "Hank Hill Special Deal" lol.


Why hasn't he been promoted to management? Most companies don't have a career track for the single most productive IC ever, and he's probably capable of improving other people's work anyway if he managed them.


Because being an effective individual contributor and being an effective manager require different skills? Because the goal of a software company is at least nominally to produce software, and paying people who are good at producing software to produce software is how you produce software?

Even if you did promote your best engineer, that just means that a different employee at your company is now your best engineer and the same dynamics apply. (Until, of course, you promote everyone competent to management, and then your organization is doomed to slowly suffocate itself. Then it's beyond saving, union or no union.)


First level managers still write code where I'm from. In the Peopleware system, you'd give an expert like that direct reports to act as assistants.


Thats ok - they are one in a million anyway. We are talking about people in general, not exceptional diamonds (they clearly can take care of themselves).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: