Absolutely. In yesterday's thread, for example, the other party had a specific agenda, and wouldn't budge, so I let them have it. I did give them a couple of chances, nevertheless.
It is annoying, though, when folks cast a willingness to recognize all sides of an argument as being "biased," because it does not agree with their side.
I also don't like being called a liar, which is what they did, I assume, because they were unable to comprehend being able to recognize all sides of an issue (I was raised amongst diplomats, so I got that kind of thinking since I was a wee sprog).
It is annoying, though, when folks cast a willingness to recognize all sides of an argument as being "biased," because it does not agree with their side.
I also don't like being called a liar, which is what they did, I assume, because they were unable to comprehend being able to recognize all sides of an issue (I was raised amongst diplomats, so I got that kind of thinking since I was a wee sprog).