Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have to disagree. Nowadays, limited liability companies are literally an optimization mechanism for turning profits.

Believe me, if consumers were not aware and the law not enforced, there would be (are ?) companies making clothes in slave-like conditions.



GP is implying that companies that don't are by definition performing poorly by missing out on the margin.


In short: My argument is that it is possible (and should be expected) to be be ethically responsible without being fiscally irresponsible. This should be obvious.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: