Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I (and I would assume the OP) agrees that saying "entirely pointless" may be a bit hyperbolic

However the point stands that as a concept, humans will find a way to exploit and corrupt any technology. This is unquestionably true.

Bertrand Russell famously makes exactly this point as well, albeit specifically when it comes to violent application of technology in war. That: until all war is illegal every technological development will be used for War.

Your point however is also true, in that in certain spaces for certain audiences (communities), participants make it more difficult to exploit these things in ways that they don't want to and to explout them in ways they do.

Ergo, Technology is and remains neutral (as it has no will of it's own) and the people using and implementing technology are very much not neutral and imbue the will of the user onto the tool.

The real question you should be asking is, how powerful can a free tool/knowledge get before people start saying that only certain class of "clerics" can use it or that most communities agree that NO community should have it.

Notice on that last point how not-hard we're trying to get rid of Nuclear Weapons



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: