>The fact that they got rid of the part of the PR review process that matters, and only saw a 1.5% improvement speaks to all sorts of problems in the process overall, not an improvement by this tool
The 1.5% improvement was from better suggestions on who would be a good person to review the diff.
The next reviewable diff feature "resulted in a 17 percent overall increase in review actions per day (such as accepting a diff, commenting, etc.) and that engineers that use this flow perform 44 percent more review actions than the average reviewer!"
The 1.5% improvement was from better suggestions on who would be a good person to review the diff.
The next reviewable diff feature "resulted in a 17 percent overall increase in review actions per day (such as accepting a diff, commenting, etc.) and that engineers that use this flow perform 44 percent more review actions than the average reviewer!"