Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Every one of those paths I mentioned are paths I have encountered during my use of various unix distributions since 1991 (Solaris was the worst offender). And that's not even the complete list. I gave up trying to predict where software would install to a long time ago.

My point is that what "makes sense" is subjective. Each developer/distro manager who made one of those paths thought to himself "it makes perfect sense to do it this way". FHS does go a long way towards cutting back on the craziness (by arbitrarily dictating "do it this way"), but it's still clunky.



Your encountering them doesn't make them part of FHS.

Their being included in FHS does.


At no point did I ever say they were part of the FHS.


OP did, and by inference (with my pedant bit set) you were supporting his statements. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3520178


Hmm that was not my intent.


Most of us are more concerned about the real world than a "standard" that is routinely ignored.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: