Nothing you said here makes any sense at all. People are out there using 10 gigabit networking. There are benchmarks that show how slow the atom cpus are. There no power shortage. Why do you believe these ideas?
To be clear here, you are predicting the future and in that future there is for some reason not enough power to play a game from 12 years ago, even though it can be played on a 65W AMD chip. You realize that refrigerators, space heaters and air conditioners take about 10x-30x the amount of power you are saying won't be available in the future right?
The burden of proof is on the people who make the (ridiculous) claims.
With that price you are paying almost $1 per day of running your 65W computer.
That's $30 per month just to keep the computer gaming during daytime.
There is no roof for how high prices or inflation can go.
Other gear are more important than entertainment, people will not consume games when they are hungry or cold (though computers help with that somewhat).
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that nuclear is heating the planet more than CO2, the efficiency of nuclear is 35% so for every KWh of electricity you heat the planet with 3 KWh.
3KWh that the planet has to radiate into space that did not get added during any time before.
We are slowly boiling the planet, like frogs in a casserole.
Eventually you wont have the energy, money or time to play anything.
That's $30 per month just to keep the computer gaming during daytime.
No it is not. 65W is the max amount of power. 10 hours a day every day at max is still a little over $4 per month. TVs, refrigerators electric heating and air conditioning are all 20x the impact of an average computer.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that nuclear is heating the planet more than CO2
You should not go out on a limb for anything. You should read and stop guessing.
Where are you getting your ideas? Source something, link anything that supports what you are saying.
