I’ve spent quite a bit of time with both, but I’m not an expert in this field so take my comments with a fist of salt.
It’s pretty good. Certainly as good as GPT-3.5 for speed and quality. Claude seems to consider the context you’ve supplied more than GPT-3.5.
Compared to GPT-4, it has similar levels of knowledge. Claude is less verbose. It’s less good at building real world models based on context. Anecdotally, I’ve found it hallucinated more than GPT.
So, it’s probably better at summarising large blocks of text, but less good at generating content that requires knowledge outside of what you’ve supplied.
It’s pretty good. Certainly as good as GPT-3.5 for speed and quality. Claude seems to consider the context you’ve supplied more than GPT-3.5.
Compared to GPT-4, it has similar levels of knowledge. Claude is less verbose. It’s less good at building real world models based on context. Anecdotally, I’ve found it hallucinated more than GPT.
So, it’s probably better at summarising large blocks of text, but less good at generating content that requires knowledge outside of what you’ve supplied.