Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

(WarpStream founder)

1. Yeah, we mention at the end of the post the P99 produce latency is ~400ms. 2. MSK still charges you for networking to produce into the cluster and consumer out of it if follower fetch is not properly configured. Also, you still have to more or less manage a Kafka cluster (hot spotting, partition rebalancing, etc). In practice we think WarpStream will be much cheaper to use than MSK for almost all use-cases, and significantly easier to manage.



How does the cost compare if follower fetch is properly configured?


1. what payload size and flush interval is that latency measured against?


1. By payload size do you mean record size? They're ~1KiB 2. Flush interval was 100ms, the agent defaults to 250ms though I believe.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: