Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How is that light weight? let's see it has scripts for skeloton projects/models/etc, has it's own orm's, and even ships with its own package manager. that seems like a lot of stuff is you're looking to light weight.


"How is that light weight?"

Look at the description:

"Monorail.js will never force you to install anything not needed for your project. The goal is to use what you need."

Plus, it's definitely lighter than express.


As far as I can tell, this actually uses express.


Ah, I stand corrected. I apologize.

I think if I were to use a node MVC framework built on express, I'd go with Matador: http://obvious.github.com/matador/


Matador actually looks pretty sweet.


[deleted]


The M in MVC has nothing to do with database persistence. That is a wonderful perception that rails and its ilk have given us, for better or worse. You could build a complete system that fully implements MVC without database persistence, or really any persistence at all.


For your enlightenment MVC isn't what you think it means.

http://andrzejonsoftware.blogspot.ca/2011/09/rails-is-not-mv...

Even if you are using the Rails version of the term MVC, as one commenter was keen to point out, it still has nothing to do with having data persistence or not.


I think he meant

    [ u s e r @ma c h i n e E x amp l e ] $ . . / mo n o r a i l . j s i n s t a l l mo o t o o l s


Wow, what a hostile response.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: