Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wish the wikipedia leads were more concise. A two sentence description of the concept in the most basic understandable language possible.

Then the next paragraph can be a more accurate lead.

The the content list; then the contents.

Your zoomable book idea is a good one. I'd prefer authority with good cites over crowd-sourced with semi-random citing.



I recommend checking out the "Simple English" wikipedia for more complex topics. It breaks those sentences down even more and is fantastic for math articles and the like.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: