Haters gonna hate is such a deep thought, I guess we have a new journalist competing for the pulitzer this year.
All in all, thinking about it, would have been better to have a world without flight, since I think it favoured globalisation and shrinking of working class rights, pollution, hypertourism and another kind of pollution, as italian i’d summon inhabitants of venice to see what they think of the americans flying in, I’d argue flying is a net negative discovery
Good luck pushing your brand of decelerationism here. Maybe one day we can all return to being peasants farming fields and releasing zero carbon emissions in whatever world you're idealizing.
I’m making an argument by offering some of the effects of a shrinked world on general population, you can also reply with less generalised response and say why each point was not correct, I am not advocating for farming probably, but more exposing my opinion of how each innovation has had destructive effects on us
I don’t have to push anything, I think it’s the planet itself that will push its own brand of antitech by displacing populations and becoming less inhabitable, hope all the servant of capitalism will be happy when they will die thanks to the effect of climate change thinking that thanks to them their corporate overlords will be mostly ok, will they have consumed enough? Will they have worked enough? Will they have been good subjects?
All in all, thinking about it, would have been better to have a world without flight, since I think it favoured globalisation and shrinking of working class rights, pollution, hypertourism and another kind of pollution, as italian i’d summon inhabitants of venice to see what they think of the americans flying in, I’d argue flying is a net negative discovery