If EU is so good at promoting innovation and competition, why couldn’t they compete at all in hardware, software, and AI?
If they’re so good at dissuading gate keepers, then why is LVMH everywhere and so dominant in luxury goods? Why is it that every single glasses shop in every mall is owned by Luxottica no matter the brand.
The truth is that EU is not good at promoting competition. They’re good at preventing innovation. They’re good at protectionist policies.
How many more cookie prompts do people have to click because of idiotic EU laws?
IMO if anything it's the opposite. EU could have made law to respect DNT header
if they wanted privacy but they won't because it would hurt "their" companies. Instead they tried to be super vague and preferentially sue companies who they have qualms with and the companies which they could get money from.
My previous company hired a lawyer from EU for sorting out GDPR, and even according to him the law didn't prevented all things which hurts privacy like a normal person will assume.
Like Arm? Or raspberry pi? (Both existed pre-exit)
> software,
Too many companies to list.
> and AI?
Like Mistral?
> How many more cookie prompts do people have to click because of idiotic EU laws?
It's up to the companies. Every time you see a banner it means the company values selling your information more than pissing you off. We could have no banners right now.
If they’re so good at dissuading gate keepers, then why is LVMH everywhere and so dominant in luxury goods? Why is it that every single glasses shop in every mall is owned by Luxottica no matter the brand.
The truth is that EU is not good at promoting competition. They’re good at preventing innovation. They’re good at protectionist policies.
How many more cookie prompts do people have to click because of idiotic EU laws?