> an artist would use the AI as a tool to convey his meaning.
I'm not sure why this is shoved in as an aside near the end of the comment. This is how it's used. This is how it'll be used to create games.
Does anyone think that, what, ChatGPT is going to poop out an entire finished game and we'll release that? Or would artists use AI as just another tool to create their art?
> I'm not sure why this is shoved in as an aside near the end of the comment. This is how it's used. This is how it'll be used to create games.
No one who is good at what they do wants to do this. Everyone who is bad at what they do is doing this. I don't know why tech people think they understand the art industry at all.
What context did I miss exactly that would change the fact that people can work in multiple industries at once, or can change industries over time, or the large overlap between "tech" and "art" these days?
>Does anyone think that, what, ChatGPT is going to poop out an entire finished game and we'll release that?
Well if this trajectory continues upwards, it almost certainly will happen in the next decade.
Right now feels like how the 70's-80's felt with the rise of the microprocessor. Tons of promise and implementation ideas, but the tech just wasn't there yet. But sure as hell it came around.
I'm not sure why this is shoved in as an aside near the end of the comment. This is how it's used. This is how it'll be used to create games.
Does anyone think that, what, ChatGPT is going to poop out an entire finished game and we'll release that? Or would artists use AI as just another tool to create their art?