There is a difference between saying "We don't know" and "this is wrong"
Without preponderance of evidence, the former would be more correct, but the latter is more prevalent.
It's very easy to reject things that need more research. Then IF it's researched more thoroughly and inconsistent with the theory THEN rejection is in order.
But instead, several research lines are rejected because of politics, 'playing it safe', etc
Without preponderance of evidence, the former would be more correct, but the latter is more prevalent.
It's very easy to reject things that need more research. Then IF it's researched more thoroughly and inconsistent with the theory THEN rejection is in order.
But instead, several research lines are rejected because of politics, 'playing it safe', etc