Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Absolutely the case for me. I don't give Snowflake much here, but Hudson Rock sells this exact type of "protection" and so far including BBC, no other independent verification?

This from the GP's link does it: “should have bought protection from Hudson Rock could have saved them this one”



We should thread carefully on this one.

It might be that they genuinely geeked out.

Hudson reputation would forever be scarred (badly) if they tried to manipulate the narrative.

Going down this hole also means we discredit the perpetrator, even if he did specifically reach out to Hudson.

Just wanted to say this so we don’t immediately jump to conclusions.


It's the first time I heard from Hudson and they didn't start out great reputation wise for me




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: