Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I do not think this is fair evaluation.

Sentence 1: specified that quote is about one specific kind of speech.

Sentence 2: explains origins of the quote - history. It is the history part that makes this sentence valuable and adds something to the reader (me).

Sentence 3: states that this is not effective to the kind of content we talk about - internet articles.

Sentence 4: concludes that repetition is irrelevant and wrong.

-----------------------

The way you tl;dr it, the poster would need to completely change the topic to "not repeat themselves". What they did was saying something new with each sentence, just keeping the "repetition" topic on.



Ok that's fair. Your summary is more accurate and gets the GP's point across better.

Thanks




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: