>"Engineer" in the software world is just a job title like calling yourself a "scrum ninja". It's not a protected title like "professional engineer" in the US
getting an engineering degree from a university requires you to study a lot of the same higher mathematics regardless of specific field, and entitles you to call yourself an engineer, even in CS.
the "professional engineer" certification is a bit more vocational, indicates you've passed qualifying exams based less on intense math and more on your knowing standards for specific govt building codes, etc.
The core of classic engineering is learning how to work with Mother Nature OS. In software engineering you almost never have to deal with that absolute gut punch of an OS (usually at worst you just have to deal with the humans who are a product of it), and don't need to take classes to learn about it.
To be a professional engineer, or just engineer really, you need to maintain your license, be in good standing with the regulatory bodyz have professional insurance, etc. The regulatory body can impose fine, mandatory training or disbar you for any ethical or technical deficiency. It's not a one time certification as you seem to believe.
I am not aware of the US having any laws on who can call themselves Engineer or not - it's not like Canada. Having a printer and a sheet of business card blanks entitles me to call myself an engineer.
That press release seems to be specifically about their failure to get him to stop using the term “engineer,” and the fact that the legal system recognizes a difference between it and the more protected term “professional engineer.”
> laws on who can call themselves Engineer or not - it's not like Canada
It is like Canada in practice, depends on the terminolgoy they use. The two world's of "engineering" are so separated from each other, that's why I wrote a comment and that's why you are unaware of the distinction.
You have skyscrapers in Canada, oui? If you want to change something structural on the facade (O, Canada, I mean façade) near the top of a skyscraper, like put in a balcony/observation deck, they are not going to let you do that till your plans are reviewed by a licensed engineer. Not any old engineer, only by somebody Licensed to review plans like that, who will take into account everything that needs to be taken into account, like crap falling on pedestrians walking below, 30 years from now when the concrete is starting to disintegrate.
That is a licensed engineer. Canada has them. You don't know about them because you don't own a skyscraper. I know about them because I was on my condo board... in a skyscraper. they do structural, electrical, HVAC, plumbing, etc.
The school I went to was 80% mechanical engineers. Had they offered computer engineering, as compared to computer science, my degree would have had more overlap with physical science than virtual science (of computer engineering).
It’s just not a practical degree in the US. You don’t need thermodynamics, statics, and a bunch of other physical engineering requirements to build software.
getting an engineering degree from a university requires you to study a lot of the same higher mathematics regardless of specific field, and entitles you to call yourself an engineer, even in CS.
the "professional engineer" certification is a bit more vocational, indicates you've passed qualifying exams based less on intense math and more on your knowing standards for specific govt building codes, etc.