You’re looking at this from a point of view with inherent bias, that has no guarantee of being lesser in degree than the ones that produced the literature.
You're looking at this from the point of view that bias is inherently bad. It's not. Biases do not need to be "lesser in degree" to allow adding something new to a conversation. They only need to be different from existing ones.
Hmm, I spent some time thinking about this comment, and I still don't get your point. Does my bias invalidate my claim? I mean I don't have any hard evidence that this is happening, but from a historical point is makes sense to me. If you disagree, it would be helpful to point out why, rather than to call out my bias.
