Statements that begin like this are nearly always rhetorical attempts to subvert the standard usage of the terminology.
> but they're completely unenforced
Utterly irrelevant from a legal perspective. Also entirely circumstantial in that it depends entirely on the license holder and can easily vary between end users.
I'm also rather confused how RAIL entered into this to begin with. Unless I've missed something significant, most variants (or at least high end variants) of Stable Diffusion [0] and Flux [1] are under non-commercial licenses.
Not that I take issue with that. I've no delusion that a company is going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on compute and then open the floor to competitors who literally clone their data.
Statements that begin like this are nearly always rhetorical attempts to subvert the standard usage of the terminology.
> but they're completely unenforced
Utterly irrelevant from a legal perspective. Also entirely circumstantial in that it depends entirely on the license holder and can easily vary between end users.
I'm also rather confused how RAIL entered into this to begin with. Unless I've missed something significant, most variants (or at least high end variants) of Stable Diffusion [0] and Flux [1] are under non-commercial licenses.
Not that I take issue with that. I've no delusion that a company is going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on compute and then open the floor to competitors who literally clone their data.
[0] https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/stable-diffusion-3.5-larg...
[1] https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux/blob/main/model_li...