My point was that HN glorifies things it does not understand well, purely on aesthetic grounds. While real breakthroughs very often goes unnoticed.
Its a bias. And struggling to find truth we should try to eliminate biases, we should first learn to see dem. Downvoting a comment which points out a very apparent bias is indeed just another testament to this ignorance. It is super ignoring to also downvote comment of actual geomatics practitioner and a teacher. It is sad if not else.
The comment had zero judging whether is fair or deserved to get stupid points on some investor news site. I would love to see other aesthetic projects featured. But in all honesty - perhaps a GPT will get it right from the first time.
Its a bias. And struggling to find truth we should try to eliminate biases, we should first learn to see dem. Downvoting a comment which points out a very apparent bias is indeed just another testament to this ignorance. It is super ignoring to also downvote comment of actual geomatics practitioner and a teacher. It is sad if not else.
The comment had zero judging whether is fair or deserved to get stupid points on some investor news site. I would love to see other aesthetic projects featured. But in all honesty - perhaps a GPT will get it right from the first time.