That would be a result set layer, not a connection pool. Could make sense if you... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		ivan_gammel 11 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Software development topics I've changed my mind o... That would be a result set layer, not a connection pool. Could make sense if you worked with rows, but if you use ORM, why mapping cached row again and again? ORMs cache hydrated objects, which seems to be more efficient.

capitainenemo 11 months ago [–]

Yeah, it was more to see if there were any benefits to an ORM that could be used without the, well "ORM" part :)

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact