> Also, from desktop snapshot, in task manager it showed 4 CPUs, with 3 of them at almost 100%
The Ars Technica image guy made that screenshot. It wasn't from running my emulator, which is strictly single-core (for a whole host of reasons I won't get into.)
Your guess is as good as mine why he chose that screenshot, I didn't know about it until after the article was published.
Thank you for the answer, byuu. Don't get me wrong, your emulator is great, and I apreciate very much your commitment with open source. I simply pointed about the Nesticle patches were not necessary for speeding up the emulation, and that 3GHz was overkill, in my opinion. I bet in the future it will be much faster, no mater if is optimized by yourself o by others (I understand that may be optimization is not your goal, my point is just that the 3GHz is not a requirement just because precission, but because of current implementation). Best regards, and please, excuse me for telling you "idiot" in a previous post, change it by "innacurate" (Nesticle thing) and "incomplete" (3GHz required not only because accuracy, but also because current implementation limitations).
The Ars Technica image guy made that screenshot. It wasn't from running my emulator, which is strictly single-core (for a whole host of reasons I won't get into.)
Your guess is as good as mine why he chose that screenshot, I didn't know about it until after the article was published.