Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My point is that "well informed" and "misinformation" are dog whistles implying the speaker presumes they're superior, they know absolute truth, and clearly the unwashed masses are too stupid to understand their own best interests. They must be saved from themselves. Etc.

"Informed" and "falsehoods" serve perfectly well. Inform people don't fight misinformation. Correct falsehoods don't well-inform the public.



I think you might be projecting here, this is at least not my meaning or interpretation of the world.


> True, but even “least bad” is not correct unless the public is well informed [as in not being fed misinformation]...

You opened by saying that democracy is not ideal unless the populace's information diet is carefully controlled.

By whom and in what way? Who gets to determine what is misinformation? What happens when they deem misinformation rampant or the public not well-informed?

> I think you might be projecting...

I am indeed projecting. I find those specific words only in use among unreasonably self-sure people who aren't terrified by the implications/risks of concentrating power to answer those consequent questions.

> The difference in election outcomes around the 1930s, 1990s and 2020s can be mostly explained by these factors.

But my projecting isn't unjustified. Quoted above, you also began by stating the 2020s electorate was duped with misinformation. Had they only known better, understood their own best interests as seen through the eyes of the self-assuredly enlightened, listened to the nascent Ministry of Truth, etc.


> You opened by saying that democracy is not ideal unless the populace's information diet is carefully controlled. By whom and in what way? Who gets to determine what is misinformation? What happens when they deem misinformation rampant or the public not well-informed?

No. I said it works if people are not fed misinformation. The actual truth decides what is misinformation. Sometimes one can’t know it but sometimes one can.

As an example: “Ukraine started the war” is misinformation by virtue of being false.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: