I vouched for it, as I read the article and couldn't understand why it would be flagged. There was a comment implying the author is intrinsically bad, so maybe people are voting ad hominem.
Probably just because of "dupe" since it was posted some time ago.
Just thought it would have been interesting, as there is right now this topic of independence of browsers and that search engines may possibly not be allowed to pay to be the default search (which would significantly impact Mozilla's budget).