Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But the coroutine object itself isn't synchronous, it represents suspended processing and by stuffing it into a task can be run asynchronously. If we don't try to consider it a separate third thing, I'd still put the coroutine object in the asynchronous bucket and say await is the thing synchronously waiting for it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: