Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How does ratcheting up the charges minimize the embarassment to the DOJ if Aaron is ultimately vindicated?


Presumably they're ratcheting up the pressure on Aaron to accept a plea bargain.


That sounds plausible; also, isn't this what happens after plea negotiations fail?


Yes.


The DoJ isn't human and is not subject to emotions like "pride" or "embarrassment." Their goal is to win cases and enforce laws, and if the bureaucratic cost of adding more charges improves their chances of having the defendant found guilty on them, they're successful.


The DoJ is part of the executive branch, and ultimately answerable to elected officials who absolutely are sensitive to embarassment. No one wants to see a headline like "FBI wastes $2M on failed prosecution of harmless nerd" when it could be "Hacker gets jail time and fine". So they're throwing mud trying to get something to stick. If it looks like anything does, they'll offer a plea again.

You can't really believe that politics have no impact on the case decisions in the DoJ, can you?


If your point here is, "it doesn't", I agree. I don't think the extra charges were added to minimize embarrassment.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: