Have you done anything interesting with this army that you can share and you're proud of? Specifically something concrete you can link to, not just something you can imagine or describe?
I believe LLM, (specifically code gen) has produced nothing of substance. I'm looking for evidence to disprove that assumption. You're welcome to share nothing, but when you brag about how it's fantastical, it's reasonable to ask. And then no one can never prove it... I can only hear that as; I could if I want to, I just don't want to.
If you don't want field questions about it, don't brag about it?
Equally, to your condemnation: the problem with AI enjoyers is they claim it's nearly perfect, and it can do everything, and it makes them so much faster. But every example is barely more than boilerplate, or it's a sham.
Some of work on proprietary software. Systems, firmwares, memory allocators, compilers, runtimes. You know, things that don't have fancy web pages or even stand-alone git repos because the code is just being continually reviewed and merged alongside human written code.
I'm not even OP so I don't know of it applies to them, but the above applies to me and it's been extremely helpful to me.
I'm not looking for a fancy webpage. I'm not looking for revolutionary output. I'm looking for at it's most basic level commits, that are, without a doubt meaningful. I'm looking for someone to say; "look at this" I claim that I couldn't have done this is the same amount of time without AI, it would have been harder without, and I'm proud of this.
Someone to claim, honestly. They've created something they take pride in, something they feel to them, is impressive. That they couldn't have done without AI.
And then for it to appear to anyone that looks, that the thing they're proud of is obviously, and meaningfully significant such that it' couldn't be considered by anyone half reasonable to be boilerplate. And then, ideally but not required; for me to not feel embarrassed by proxy for them, when they claim they're proud of the AI supported output.
Surely, if it's as helpful, and as revolutionary as the current fervor claims. Someone, or anyone, should be willing to say. Look at this commit. Look at this project, look at this repo. I'm proud of it, and I want everyone to know I'm proud of it. And I wouldn't have been able to to it with out the support of an LLM? At least someone would have created something, they wish to release into the open source world. And claim they take pride in it?
Its very hard for any of LLM fans to share anything substantial, Its always just demos and prototypes which even they have no idea how it works. If you work for any big company, you know all of LLM fans who are just trying desperately to show their managers and leaders that they can use LLMs. Even publicly famous programmers who run 10 agents at the same time, when you use their products you see they have become buggy and they have been shipping more slop than their customers require.
You broke the site guidelines badly and repeatedly in this thread. We ban accounts that do that. I don't want to ban you, so if you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
