Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why would a good sync service with history be a backup? They don't store a history indefinitely. Of course destroying files and history is a bug, but something that instantly replicates changes to those files from machine-to-machine shouldn't be considered a reliable way to recover them weeks or months later.


Dropbox does have "Packrat unlimited undo history" for $4/month. I wonder if he could have recovered these files if he had this option.


Does git push+pull not count as a "good sync service"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: