Is there a single "document containing all the words," and it updates the website, pdf, and epub whenever you change it?
What struck me was that the presentation is beautiful. It seems worth emulating. But that raises the question of what format you'd write your original words in. Do you suppose they just use Markdown files, or something more elaborate?
I am not the author of the site in question, but I suspect that your guess is right, and that Pandoc is the hub between the spokes.
For my blog, I write posts in Markdown. Then the build process uses Pandoc to convert the posts into web pages and, for certain pages, PDF files typeset with TeX. For example, here is a post in both web and PDF versions:
Beautiful. I don't suppose you have public, detailed installation steps for how to go from "nothing exists" to "Pandoc can push posts to https://blog.moertel.com/"? :)
The best I was able to do was http://github.com/shawwn/wiki, which has been broken since 2020. You can't spell Haskell without Hell.
If you wouldn't mind pulling up a `claude` in your repo and running `/init` and showing the result, that'd give me at least a vague idea of what to do.
Thanks. I do not have a public, detailed description of how my blog works. But in short, my site build system is powered by a Makefile that invokes Hakyll [1]. My Hakyll configuration has the following rule baked into it for generating HTML docs from Markdown docs in the `posts/` directory:
The `pandocMathCompiler` bit invokes Hakyll's Pandoc subsystem with support for rendering formulas using MathJax.
The site Makefile also has rules to build PDF versions of the articles that I want to typeset. The rules just invoke Pandoc directly. For example, here's the rule used to generate the PDF file in my prior comment:
It's basically a straightforward invocation of Pandoc with a little shell boilerplate to prevent the PDF file from being moved into its final location unless Pandoc exits with success.
The Makefile has a final "push" target that makes sure the site's assets are up to date (invoking Hakyll if needed) and then pushes the static site up to the content distribution network I'm using to publish my website.
Would you be willing to paste your entire Makefile here? Or are there secrets in it?
It would help me greatly — I don't have much experience with pandoc or hakyll. I understand the basics, but the actual usage in practice isn't so easy to set up from first principles.
I've been using Claude to help me with a lot of this, but I'm extremely curious to compare notes vs your setup.
# Binary tool we use to build the website.
bins = dist-newstyle/build/*/*/*/*/site/build/site
tool = $(bins)/site
# By default, we build everything if you invoke `make` without a target.
all: build
.PHONY: all
# The tool used to build the site is a Hakyll binary configured by `site.hs`.
# This rule automatically builds the tool if it's out of date.
$(tool): site.hs site.cabal
cabal v2-build
# The `build` target builds the web site's out-of-date static assets.
.PHONY: build
build: $(tool) pdfs
$(tool) build
# The `rebuild` target forces a rebuild of all web assets.
.PHONY: rebuild
rebuild: $(tool)
$(tool) rebuild
# This `push` rule publishes the static site to our CDN (firebase).
# It requires:
#
# - the `firebase` tool:
# wget -O ~/bin/firebase https://firebase.tools/bin/linux/latest \
# && chmod +x ~/bin/firebase
# # Docs: https://firebase.google.com/docs/cli#linux
#
# - `firebase login --no-localhost` to have been run.
#
# You may need to run `firebase login --no-localhost --reauth` if
# the local authentical credentials time out.
.PHONY: push
push: build
firebase deploy --only hosting
# Generate PDF versions of selected blog posts.
.PHONY: pdfs
pdfs: images/public_html/blog/pix-20240601/sampling-with-sql.pdf
images/public_html/blog/pix-20240601/sampling-with-sql.pdf: posts/2024-08-23-sampling-with-sql.md
( cd posts && pandoc --metadata-file=../templates/latex-header-includes.yaml -t pdf -o ../[email protected] --pdf-engine=pdflatex ../$< && mv -f ../[email protected] ../$@ )
ADDED 2026-04-21: Confirmed that it’s Pandoc doing the typesetting. The end of the author’s typeset version of the blog posts includes this colophon:
> This piece, like most all my words and software, was written by
hand—mainly in Vim. I composed a Markdown outline in a mix
of headers, bullet points, and prose, then reorganized it in a few
passes. With the structure laid out, I rewrote the outline as prose,
typeset with Pandoc. I went back to make substantial edits as I
wrote, then made two full edit passes on typeset PDFs. For the
first I used an iPad and stylus, for the second, the traditional
pen and paper, read aloud.
I talked about this in the colophon of the piece, but perhaps you'd like an example? This is Pandoc Markdown--basically Markdown, a little bit of YAML front matter, a smattering of inline LaTeX, and some very small shell scripts. Here's the the build scripts and a little bit of fronttmatter if you'd like to do the same:
Is there a single "document containing all the words," and it updates the website, pdf, and epub whenever you change it?
What struck me was that the presentation is beautiful. It seems worth emulating. But that raises the question of what format you'd write your original words in. Do you suppose they just use Markdown files, or something more elaborate?