Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have several Kindles for me and my kids, I have never bought a book on the Amazon store, instead I side load everything. Amazon basically subsidized a cheap and tough e-reader assuming it would drive everyone to the store, which I actively do not engage with. If it gets bricked in 10 years, I still think it would be worth it.


Just to be clear, "bricked" here means:

1. if you factory reset a device after May 20, you will not be able to sign in or use the device at all.

2. if you have one already you can use it with your downloaded books but you cannot use the official store at all.

You might not have a problem with #2, but #1 is a dealbreaker imo


Again, this is after 13 years, so the subsidized price is worth it for me (personally) for at least 13 years of use. In the original article it compares it to kobo and says “Meanwhile, when you buy a Kobo, you are buying a tool that can be maintained for a decade or more”, so 13 years either way. That said, I don’t like Kindles approach, this is purely a cost benefit calculation and Amazon subsidizing the hardware makes it worth it (for me). I only use ereaders for reading and don’t want/need any more features.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: