Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Simon, is your pelican test really captures differences among models or should you at least try like 10 times or something to average the random effects


I've been meaning to do a "run 3 times and pick the best" version for quite a while, I should really pull the trigger on that one. Currently it's one-shot only.


You could run 3 times and overlay/average the images to show how consistent they are


Best-of-3 would be cheating, ruin the test, middle of 3 makes more sense


Why would you need the 3rd run if you pick the "one in the middle"?


Middle as in not the best, and not the worst. As opposed to the second generated in sequence.

But not the best/not the worst is somewhat subjective.. so not sure how well that would work.


I think GP meant picking the median pelican




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: