Wikipedia doesn't "ban viewpoints". I'm guessing you're referring to their considering some sources as more reliable than others?

What source would you include that they don't allow referencing?

Try posting any URL from the Daily Mail. See what happens.

So you would source from Daily Mail?

Maybe.

I'm for viewing all sides of every argument and coming to my own conclusions.

Who are these Wikipedo censors?

Not one of them has the circular objects between their legs to stand behind their Orwellian editorship.

I'd love to have a conversation with you, but I'm uninterested in commentary attacking others. It's not appropriate here.

When you say maybe, what makes you think it's a valuable source?