Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I see what you are saying but then where do you draw the line? What if the wifi name is “fuck all pilots” - “united is doomed” or “we will all die”?
 help



Not OP, but why draw a line for WiFi names at all? Do you think an actual terrorist goes around drawing attention like that?

That's not even necessary. The fact that it could create panic is enough.

And by the way, a terrorist is (by definition) someone who wants to incite terror in others. So any person knowingly broadcasting "we will all die” is a terrorist already.


Or a nihilist, or a fatalist, or a pessimist, or an antinatalist, or a realist.

Don't go putting people into boxes. That's the path of persecution.

You have the inalienable right to say what you want on a plane, limited by what the government is allowed to prosecute. In a confined space, that is a bit riskier. That's a solely personal choice - no laws are being broken. The Captain has the right to ask you to conform or leave, but that's a separate issue.

People are being overly sensitive. A wifi name is not a protest. It does not disturb personal privacy and tranquility. It's about as offensive as an article titled "We’re All Gonna Die!" from your favorite news outlet - which by the way, is not an uncommon headline.

What if my wifi name was "peanut butter for all!" but unbeknownst to me and by some rare cosmic coincidence everyone on the plane was deathly allergic to peanut butter. Does that make me a terrorist? No! But I swear someone would try to drag me through decades of litigation regardless. These people seem to have divorced words and meanings from the mechanics of how the world works. Like, "this piece of paper says you shouldn't say this, so off with your head".


> The Captain has the right to ask you to conform or leave, but that's a separate issue.

It's not a separate issue, because the captain very likely will err on the side of caution if he has to decide whether you are a terrorist or a nihilist.


You think... a device named "Free Palestine, F Israel" could... create panic? I'm sorry, that is crazy. Only a crazy person would panic over that

I don't fly very often, but every time there's at least one person I would consider crazy enough for that.

Then at put that person in jail, not the person with the tacky device name.

Do you hear yourself? You're saying we should be irrational because there's irrational people. That we should send people to jail because they might upset an irrational person? You're sending the wrong person to jail. Are you crazy?


You're interpreting a lot, as I didn't say any of that.

What I'm saying is that the decision whether or not something is considered a risk is completely at the discretion of the captain. And by accepting the terms of the airline when boarding the plane, you agree to follow the orders of the captain.

So if that captain says "turn it off", you turn it off. It's very simple.

But I give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you don't want to understand for the sake of confrontation, so I'll leave it at that.


terrorist/terrorism are words that should be removed from anyone's vocabulary as they have lost their meaning.

Similar to woke/wokism, these have become words used by far right extremists and politicians around the world to name anything that is against their hatred and opinions.


Propaganda is a very important part of terrorism so I would not put that past them. Imagine the headlines if something like that does happen in the future.

In short, a Pascal's wager and a demonstration that it is not easy to have good things.


I already drew the line. Credible threat. Of your three, the last one and I'm not even sure that.

I think advertisements are socially acceptable and actually expected to be as blatantly offensive as possible. How would people react if it were "Boeing go boom. Fly Airbus now! Text 777 NOW for Airbus discounts."



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: