Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I feel like if/once they reach the number of expected participants (10k), it'd be easy to filter out the spam as long as the majority are truthful.


So what prevents enemy from creating 20knparticipants constantly sending fake data?


Nothing, but what's the value when it's trivial to filter it away based on known good actors? There will be a frontline somewhere, if suddenly it's reporting drones on the other end of the country, and you know there is no good nodes there, you ignore it.


[flagged]


"Unwanted traffic", is what I go by typically. What is your understanding (if you have one) of that term?


Spam specifically means (at least originally) so much unwanted traffic that it overwhelms legitimate traffic. So can I see why that commenter might have considered it a contradiction to say "the majority being truthful" as a strategy to deal with spam.

The name comes from a Monty Python sketch where "SPAM!" is being sung so loudly that it drowned out any other conservation.


> Spam specifically means (at least originally) so much unwanted traffic that it overwhelms legitimate traffic.

I guess what today is more commonly known as DOS (or even DDOS sometimes, even if it isn't actually "distributed" per se, for some reason).

I did know about the name since before, but not the original meaning, so cheers for the explanation :)


I'd still say DOS is a little different because it's the server that can't tell what's valid; to the human, in that situation, if their request eventually completes then it's definitely their data coming back, it just completes slowly or not at all. With spam, it's a human wading through junk to find valid data.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: