> One quick example is that the Europeans get very nervous when the waiter takes the credit card away from the table in the U.S.. This is just not done in Europe because there is a (at least perceived) history of skimming in much of Europe.
... No. It's just not done in Europe because it is _not permitted_. Chip and pin was made mandatory decades ago, and for that the cardholder must be present. It's not unreasonable to be disconcerted when something which just doesn't happen in your experience (the waiter takes your card away!) happens.
Skimming is also mostly now a US thing, as non-US cards no longer require a magnetic stripe at all (the only US has a stay of execution; Mastercard plans to completely phase out magstripes by 2033, and I think Visa is similar).
The US has _far_ more card fraud than the EU (about $15bn vs $1.5bn/year), largely for technological reasons (the US doesn't require, and many issuers don't even support, chip and pin, or 3dsecure, and of course there's the magstripe thing, though most card fraud is online these days where 3dsecure is more relevant).
> Whereas in Europe the burden of evidence (not proof) is with the cardholder.
This is the case for chip and pin transactions. It would generally _not_ be the case for foreign non-chip-and-pin transactions, though cardholders may not necessarily be aware of this.
... No. It's just not done in Europe because it is _not permitted_. Chip and pin was made mandatory decades ago, and for that the cardholder must be present. It's not unreasonable to be disconcerted when something which just doesn't happen in your experience (the waiter takes your card away!) happens.
Skimming is also mostly now a US thing, as non-US cards no longer require a magnetic stripe at all (the only US has a stay of execution; Mastercard plans to completely phase out magstripes by 2033, and I think Visa is similar).
The US has _far_ more card fraud than the EU (about $15bn vs $1.5bn/year), largely for technological reasons (the US doesn't require, and many issuers don't even support, chip and pin, or 3dsecure, and of course there's the magstripe thing, though most card fraud is online these days where 3dsecure is more relevant).
> Whereas in Europe the burden of evidence (not proof) is with the cardholder.
This is the case for chip and pin transactions. It would generally _not_ be the case for foreign non-chip-and-pin transactions, though cardholders may not necessarily be aware of this.