Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> There is a massive downside to premature inclusion of a stock that is initially overvalued

Define “massive”. SpaceX is only 1.2% of QQQ.



Can I please have 1.2% of your total net worth


No, but I will bet you that QQQ will not loose 1.2% of its value due only to SpaceX going to $0.

Sure, just give me SpaceX shares equivalent to 1.2%.


uh oh I think you lost the thread of metaphor there.


how embarrassing! Look, your joke was "If it's only 1.2%, hey, that's not that much, just give it to me for free!" We don't have to believe SPCX is worth whatever it's trading at today, but that 1.2% isn't simply being given away. Under capitalism, money is exchanged for goods and services.


FWIW, I read their joke differently: you were the one who said "only 1.2%", and they turned that on you by asking for you to part ways with "only 1.2%" of your net worth.

They are not questioning money exchange, they are questioning the "only" part, claiming this is significant.


Yes




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: