Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Reading idlewords' blog (specifically https://idlewords.com/2025/02/the_shape_of_a_mars_mission.ht...) has convinced me that human exploration of Mars is infeasible without drastic advances in space propulsion. If the journey takes over a month it's not happening.


Why is a flight longer than a month problem ? It will be much longer, more like half a year one way.

On the other hand, uninterrupted (orbital) spaceflight record now stands at 437 days, so we know humans can do it.


The blogpost I linked makes a good case for why it's a problem.

A Mars mission with current technology will require supporting humans for 600-1000 days with no resupply or rescue possible. The current record is well short of that and they also had regular resupplies.

The communications round trip delay makes a big difference. Ground crews are able to handle a lot of routine system monitoring and maintenance for orbital and lunar spacecraft, freeing up astronauts' time and mental energy for critical tasks. A Mars mission takes away most of this useful help from the ground.

You might say "AI will do it" and this may be true 10 years from now. But software is notoriously hard to get perfect and on this mission there are no second chances.


437 days in LEO that is, where they're still protected from like 90% of cosmic rays. Hauling enough shielding is going to take a lot of energy, and inadequate shielding is worse than none.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: