Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Which situation did Elon Musk put us in to? Can you elaborate? When did this situation start? What happened? What did he personally do that put us in the situation?


He personally ran the department that eviscerated funding for basic scientific research in the United States


[flagged]


Here ya go https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-026-00088-9/index.ht...

Something like 25% cut in new grants. 50% cuts to NSF... You could have just as easily found the data...


I did a word search on that article (it's impossible to read with its idiotic presentation), and "musk" is not mentioned.


Are you being serious? Are you actually not aware that Elon Musk ran the federal government department tasked with cancelling federal grants and firing government employees in 2025? How is it possible that you are not aware of this?


Present some evidence that he cut NSF spending.


A quick Google search will show you... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/04/26/nati...

You're just willfully ignorant


Asking for evidence is not "willfully ignorant". People making claims have the onus of backing them up. Anyhow, the link to the canceled projects is:

https://airtable.com/appGKlSVeXniQZkFC/shrFxbl1YTqb3AyOO?jnt...

I looked at maybe a dozen at random, and only one seemed to have anything about scientific research. Of course, that is not a complete survey, but none of them looked important. I'm sure there are a few that are important.

Which one(s) do you think are most important?


I might be biased, but everything under the Division of Mathematical Sciences in the MPS directorate is important. Math is one of those weird fields that tends to touch everything else even if not directly, and it's impossible to know prima facie which areas of research will be useful downstream to the sciences and engineering.


Most of the important maths research is funded by the Department of War. NSF is a good chunk, I'd have to look it up, but I wouldn't be concerned about this at all. Math is important for the war planners, always has been always will be.


Thanks for sharing. I don't work on weapons as a matter of deep conviction, so I'll continue to be concerned about this.


My point is math is a weapon.


Forgive me, but I don't exactly follow. This isn't obvious to me.


No worries. Sufficient encryption, or encryption breaking, technology trends toward behavior as a weapon. As such, the military is highly, highly interested in mathematics generally, and cryptography specifically. There's a ton of really fun and riveting history there, if you're interested. For a long time, "encryption" to a certain degree was export controlled, but that's not really how it works today. The point is, you cannot have effective cyberweapons without extremely sophisticated ... math.


Oh, I mean, I'm fully aware of the emphasis on codebreaking and on areas like operations research that provide optimization tools for tacticians, not to mention the ITAR restrictions on crypto export.

(I was there when only 40-bit SSL was unrestricted! I very much remember those days! They sucked!)

I guess the hangup I have is that my forays into areas like differential geometry and algebraic topology are extremely abstract, and I cannot control anyone who isn't me who misuses those tools in decidedly not-sober ways. I can only make sure that I don't have a direct hand in that kind of misuse.


I can go for that, as long as the research proposals are actually about math research.


The stuff in Airtable seems to be. The lion's share of what's there is research that has applications to, like, sensors and robotics and AI, even if the abstracts themselves don't state that, likely because the PIs behind those proposals aren't aware of those applications of their work.

(Just to illustrate how mathematicians can sometimes embody the archetype of Hans Guck-in-die-Luft: I had someone tell me once that there were no applications of ODEs or PDEs to the sciences or engineering.)


> Hans Guck-in-die-Luft

I have to upvote you just for that reference!

My mom tore out Die Geschichte vom Daumenlutscher, thinking it would be disturbing to my young mind.


Are we looking at the same link? I scrolled through a bunch of them and I could not find a single one that was NOT related to scientific research. The UI is horrible so I can't link anything on that page, but here's what I see when I click that link:

https://i.imgur.com/LzwDuKl.png

(Edited to add, these are the abstracts, because I can't fit both in one screen /facepalm: https://i.imgur.com/yQKHViO.png)

Maybe there's a different filter or ordering being applied somewhere?


Maybe you and I have different views on what constitutes scientific research.


Here is the list of projects I see (warning, text OCR'd from the screenshot) -- how many of these would you say are NOT scientific research?

Collaborative Research: Bounding global ice volumes over the last glacial cycle using reconstructions of Bering Strait flooding

Collaborative Research: Effects of government-insured mortgages

Basic Plasma Science Facility Renewal

Studies in the Climate Dynamics of Moist Process Variability and Change

NeTS: Medium: Provable Guarantees for Network Protocol Implementations

Collaborative Research: Ideas Lab: RNA-encoded Molecular Memory (REMM)

Research: Process and consequences of social partner choice revealed by multilayer network analysis

Collaborative Research: Towards the Foundation of Approximate Sampling-Based Exploration in Sequential Decision Making

Travel Grant: International School/Symposium for Space Simulations (ISSS) and Interrelationship between Plasma Experiments in the Laboratory and in Space (IPELS)

RAPID: Measuring Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Composition During and After the Los Angeles Wildland-Urban Interface Fires

GEM: Fundamental Properties of Dawnside Auroral Polarization Streams and Their Role in Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Instabilities and Dramatic Events

PFI-TT: A Rapid Multiplexed Diagnostic Tool for Serology of Tick-Borne Diseases


Funding DJT while he was running for office?


I'm not sure what situation we're in (can someone describe it please?), but did that situation only start the day Trump took office again after being elected by the American people?


Yes.

Predictability is extremely important for markets and planning and general welfare. He doesn’t have to randomly declare things on a Thursday that haven’t changed for decades and create anxiety among (you name it community or industry) just to stay in the headlines.

Donald Trump has destroyed predictability, as well as any semblance of functioning, predictable government. Trump is an extremely influential and powerful unilateral executive - in all the wrong ways.

Evidence you say? I guess tariff policy and a completely arbitrary war with Iran that roiled markets, just to name a couple from this year.


And Musks money and twitter takeover did a lot of work to convince Americans vote for Trump. Then Musk joined the administration and continued digging the hole


Ok.

The OP wrote:

> You're being down-voted (and so shall I) but I think you're right. Despite all the animosity towards him, Musk is doing things that are economically meaningful for our nation.

In the context of the US building big things, ramping up manufacturing, doing Space exploration, &c. and the person I replied to wrote:

> Musk has done a huge amount to put us INTO this situation

What situation did he put us in to in this context? Did he put us in to the situation where we are building bigger things now? Are you saying that there was a situation that we were put in to and that situation only started when Trump was elected and prior to that we were... what? Building big things and trying to restore manufacturing and now we're also doing that under Trump?

Someone here should be specific about what they're talking about instead of just "Musk bad Trump bad". Yea they're both morons or whatever but what exactly are we supposedly criticizing here? Just that Trump got elected? Ok that's a boring conversation let's switch back to talking about manufacturing and building big projects in America.


It'd be nice if his companies paid the tax they owe.

https://itep.org/elon-musk-spacex-tax-breaks-doge/


They certainly are


It was reaction to

> We'll need a few more of "him" to dig us out of this situation I reckon, but overall I still hope it's possible.

There is no hope if people like Musk are unnacountable and increasingly powerful. The situation you need to dig out of was caused by people like Musk.

And large dream projects wont make the hole smaller. They will make it deeper.


I'll bite. Things we had in December 2024 that we no longer have today, all of which contribute to the success or failure of major initiatives:

- 2.9% inflation - Billions of dollars of grants for state-run energy projects - NATCAST - Healthy & stable funding for the sciences - Competent leaders at the federal and military levels to oversee large complex projects - Healthy partnerships with allies

Specific actions that have been taken by Trump (backed by Musk) that caused us to lose the above:

- Starting an unnecessary war with Iran - Cancelling grants for energy projects specifically in blue states - Imposing nonsensical tariffs on trade partners - Starting a full-blown trade war with Canada - Alienating other allies, ex. starting a middle-east conflict without any alliances (excl. Israel) - Specifically closing NATCAST because "illegal" - Gutting of science funding by DOGE & others - Removal of competent leaders & prioritization of loyalty over competence when choosing staff

I have a hard time taking anyone seriously when they bring up anything about Trump having a positive impact on manufacturing in America. For 4+ years he's been lying to the American public about how tariffs work and claiming that US consumers paying more taxes to the US gov't in the form of tariffs is going to 'return' manufacturing to the US. We have almost half a million unfilled manufacturing jobs in the US - explain to me again why this is a capacity problem?


There's nothing to really bite on here - the OP said Elon Musk put us "in this situation" - I'm still looking for a definition or answer on what exactly this situation is. Is it a situation in which Trump is simply president? OK but Trump himself nor Musk are responsible for the previous decades of manufacturing capability destruction in the US, as an example.

If it's just complaining about Trump/Musk then yea sure let's complain about them in a different topic, but the OP was talking about Musk building big things and he undeniably has (or his companies have, rather).


What are you talking about?


Please read the thread for context.


fun fact, voters cause election consensus, not spending

not spending ensures no voters know who you are, but the most spending doesn't result in the most votes

funny prisoner's dilemma for partisans, well, more amusing if you sell ad space


> voters cause election consensus, not spending

This is potentially one of the most out of touch comments I've seen here in a while, and that's saying something.


that view doesn’t make it false


You are claiming (or pretending) that spend (ie, marketing spend) isn't one of, if not _the_, biggest factors in which of a set of options ends up being the winner?

In this case you don't get to try the options first. You made a decision based on what you've seen and heard.

And you think the advertising budget isn't the key thing?


As I wrote

“not spending ensures no voters know who you are, but the most spending doesn't result in the most votes”

Did your eyes glaze over after the first line, it’s such a short comment


The one with the intentionally broken federal government


One such example - he's using his massive wealth and influence to support fascist political movements that promise mass deportation and "remigration", and even supporting these policies explicitly himself.

In the US, his political beneficiaries have managed to "achieve" net negative migration to the US for the first time in 50 years, and the first decline in overall population in US history.

If this becomes the new trend (and if Musk gets his political desires fulfilled, it might), the hole is getting much, much deeper while our capacity to climb out is being severely impaired.

And oh yea, he killed hundreds of thousands of kids, mostly under 5.


South Africa?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: