I really want to get in the mindset of people who are like "AI is totally going to fail! Haha! Now let me just use AI to write a piece about it..."

It's not inconsistent if you think of it as the finances falling apart regardless of how useful the tool is.

The article claims that the finances fall apart because OpenAI won't hit the growth it wants. It's an interesting thing to say when using their product to write 100% of the article.

Using the free version reinforces the point.

Bubble != AI.

Yeah, the signal-to-noise ratio was way too low to keep reading for long.

What exactly do you/others feel read AI about it? I spend an inordinate amount of time with AI and this did trigger my ai-radar, something I’m otherwise very sensitive too. I’m genuinely curious what phrases/words people reacted to!

I strongly recommend summarizing the article with Claude.

Really? Did you read the article? I did. It read as quirky human to me.

You need to adjust your AI detector. I read the whole thing and it reads exactly like all the Claude reports I spend all day reading when I’m using it to write code or investigate something.

> During those first two years the loan performed beautifully: the borrower paid, the servicer collected, and the bond paid its coupon. Nothing looked wrong because the whole complex - housing, mortgages, securitization - was sitting inside the teaser period... Every ARM reset was known, dated, and contractually inevitable from the moment of origination.

This is clearly slop. Heavy use of dashes. Rules of three throughout. Pangram says 100% of what I checked was AI.

Indeed - obvious AI slop with the annoying language all of the place.