Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Leaving aside the fact that this is already the new Ubiquitous Cookie Consent[0], how do you arrive at metadata on text output satisfying this requirement?

[0]: I was just in the EU and got a chuckle out of the "AI disclaimer" coming at the end of every second advertisement, soon to be every advertisement.



> Or a paragraph that says the passage was created by AI.


So if an AI-generated thing is cut in half, and only one half can be identified as being AI-generated while the other half can not, do we think that will be OK?


Legally that is fine. LLM provider requirements is judged at the output of the LLM. Not what happens after it.


> a machine-readable format


If I get a response from the OpenAI API (or whatever), the fact that the text is embedded in a JSON object that is obviously an AI response, and even tells me which model was used and how many tokens it took, then I already have a machine-readable format clearly identifying the text as AI-generated. Whether the recipient chooses to keep that when they use the text is not my problem, right?

As the API provider, I would be very happy to consider myself compliant based on this. But I have a feeling it wouldn't fly in Brussels.


Machines can read English now /s




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: