Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My point was to relate the American POV of the judge with the America-optimistic POV of the parent comment.

Using "we" and "America" in that context is perfectly clarifying, I'm not beholden to pivot to your pet nitpick.

 help



You're not beholden to make any effort to understand me or anyone else, that's a given.

Here is what an LLM thinks about what you've done:

> The “we” is doing a lot of rhetorical work: it turns what could have been stated as “the U.S. government doesn't openly admit this” into the much broader and more dramatic “we Americans are collectively unwilling to admit it.”

I hope that helps. Or is the LLM also nitpicking and failing to understand your 'perfectly clarifying' remarks? Feel free to copy paste and ask an LLM yourself, all I did was ask it 'who is the 'we' referring to?' and copy pasted original parent and your reply.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: