> I never found a piece of text that pangram claims is 100% AI that to me seems like purely human written text.
Is that the level of sensitivity we're looking for? More than literally 0%? Do you know how crazy it'd be to achieve that, even if they were trying to?
The only counter example is when a human composed a piece deliberately trying to mimic AI slop.
So call it an AI slop detector if you want, but either way it accurately identifies stuff I don't wan't to read.