Every other paper in existence has been ingested with 99% of writers not knowing it will be retroactively used for training. But session data which is disclosed as being used in terms of service is disgusting?
If the work is duplicative/derivative then the preprints they put in sessions can be shown by the users and we can see.
What's disgusting is that they refuse to acknowledge what they and only they know: were these chats fed in to the new model that found these results?
Nobody would be disgusted at following stated policy, that's doesn't make sense, without first objecting to the policy. But you're bringing up distractions from the actual concerns: did OpenAI use the private chats and why won't they confirm or deny it?
If the work is duplicative/derivative then the preprints they put in sessions can be shown by the users and we can see.