Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have no insider knowledge but https://x.com/rakyll is working on it and she is tweeting about it and I got the impression there is a quite a team behind it. It looks like an effort in GCP.


Yes, and one thing to understand about Google is that no AI framework or tool is guaranteed to survive unless it has the explicit backing of Google Deepmind.

"Effort in GCP" is a red flag. (See Gemini CLI, which was shut down in favor of Antigravity CLI.)


Disclaimer: I'm one of the co-creators of this project.

AX is a layer that is closer to job orchestration, Agent Substrate. It's NOT an agentic framework. We use Antigravity for a few generative features but are abstracting away some of these components so anyone can bring their own. AX is trying to solve some tedious things everyone has to deal with. Layering execution with the underlying stateful worker, wiring up the network correctly, providing sub "task" identity, provisioning the right environment, proving stateful branching, auto discovery.

We want to keep Agent Substrate free of generative features and still need a layer above for some integrations that require agentic concepts and identity.

Google compute services are under GCP and I work on Kubernetes. So the comparison with Gemini CLI is not relevant here.


Antigravity CLI is far, far superior to Gemini CLI.

Plant many flowers, keep the ones that bloom and stop watering the ones that don't.


I agree on both accounts fwiw.


It is not, it is intentionally not-interoperable walled garden, unlike Gemini CLI.


Is it superior in terms of license?

And anyone who bothers to just do a side-by-side feature comparison can immediately see how many features antigravity is still missing compared to Gemini CLI even today.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: