Interested to read about these claims (and which case intended to overturn DC v Heller) but that would just make the Roberts court more political.

> Courts have a lot of power to throw out or reverse previous precedent

Yes, we've seen the death of stare decisis.

> less permanent power to change interpretation of the laws themselves.

They have to work harder to do it but this court has not been shy about reinterpeting everything through the Calvinball (originalism) lens.